Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00929
Original file (BC 2014 00929.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
          RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00929

	   		COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His wife and child be enrolled in the Survivor Benefit Plan 
(SBP).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He retired in 1989 as a colonel.  At the time of his retirement, 
he was not married.  He married on 23 October 2003 and his 
daughter was born on 30 September 2004.  Several years went by 
before he applied for SBP only to discover that a time limit 
existed between the date of marriage and the application for the 
benefit.  

His wife received her Air Force identification card within the 
first month of marriage, after which, she was registered with 
Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) and the 
Air Force Finance office.  Unfortunately, they received no 
guidance concerning the survivors benefit application. 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Data extracted from the Military Personnel Data System reflects 
the applicant retired on 24 April 1989 in the grade of colonel.  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

DFAS recommends denial.  DFAS does not have a copy of the 
applicant’s SBP declination from his retirement.  They attempted 
to recover his pay data; however, his case could not be located.  
The information they have that reflects he declined SBP for 
spouse and child at the time of his retirement came from a data 
transfer from the Air Force.  If he did decline SBP and had 
eligible beneficiaries, the declination is irrevocable.  However 
according to his marriage certificate, this is his first 
marriage.  

If he did not have a spouse and/or children at the time of his 
retirement, his SBP election should not have been 
“declined/spouse and child excluded” it should have been input 
as “no beneficiary”.  If this is the case, that his SBP was 
coded incorrectly and he did not have eligible beneficiaries at 
the time of retirement, his election should have been input as 
no beneficiaries and he could have, within one year of marriage, 
elected SBP coverage.  Unfortunately, DFAS does not have a copy 
of his original declination, nor do they have any information as 
to whether or not he had eligible beneficiaries at the time of 
his retirement. 

The Department of Defense Federal Management Regulation, Volume 
7B, Chapter 43, Paragraph 430102 states that in the case of a 
retiree electing a standard SBP annuity, the member must make 
such election before retired pay becomes payable, or if there is 
no eligible beneficiary at that time, within one year of 
acquiring an eligible beneficiary.  Lack of notification from a 
retiree to cover a new spouse under SBP within one year of 
marriage constitutes a declination of SBP coverage.

On 7 January 2004, DFAS received a letter from the applicant 
along with a copy of his marriage certificate requesting to 
change his status.  He indicated that he did not intend to 
change his withholding at that time.  Since his account 
reflected he declined with SBP coverage, a designation of 
beneficiary form was sent to him.  This form is used for any 
unpaid retired pay that may be due upon death.  The completed 
the form in January 2004, February 2004 and April 2011.  He may 
have thought the form was for SBP.  

On 22 October 2013, DFAS received an SBP election change form 
requesting a change from no coverage to spouse and child 
coverage.  However, his request could not be honored since his 
election shows that he declined SBP coverage at retirement.  If 
his election was “no beneficiary” at retirement, his request 
still could not be honored as it was over one year since his 
marriage. 

Should the Board approve the applicant’s case, retroactive 
premiums will be collected. 

The complete DFAS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

In response to a request for a Marital Status Affidavit, the 
applicant submits that he married his current spouse on 
23 October 2003 (Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.	The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the 
recommendation of the office of primary responsibility and adopt 
its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that 
notwithstanding the applicant’s declination of SBP enrollment at 
the time of retirement, he failed to make a clear election to 
participate in the SBP within the one year time period as 
prescribed by law.  Therefore, we find no basis to grant the 
relief sought in the application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00929 in Executive Session on 12 June 2015, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00929 was considered:

    	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Feb 14, w/atchs.
    	Exhibit B.  Letter, DFAS, dated 7 Apr 14.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 14.
  	Exhibit D.  Member Affidavit, dated 4 Aug 14.

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03524

    Original file (BC 2014 03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) records show the applicant requested spouse and child SBP coverage based on full retired pay prior to his 1 Nov 06 retirement. It is unfortunate that the applicant failed to notify DFAS in a timely manner of his marriage, in order to preclude a debt or to deny SBP coverage for her. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter dated 5 Mar 15, he states his spouse provided a letter relinquishing the SBP benefit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415

    Original file (20080006415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019095

    Original file (20100019095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was honorably retired on 31 December 1991 and placed on the Retired List on 1 January 1992. In Part V (SBP Election) he elected coverage for dependent children only. There is no evidence of record and none provided by the applicant to show he attempted to correct his SBP coverage election shortly thereafter or prior to the date of his application to the Board.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00221

    Original file (BC-2010-00221.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00221 INDEX CODE: 137.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that he was not married at the time he retired from the Air Force; and, to allow him to elect spouse coverage for his current wife under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). In...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009333

    Original file (20120009333.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) in a timely manner and correction of his daughter's date of birth (DOB) that is recorded in his finance record. Additionally, on 6 November 2012, an official at DFAS confirmed there was no record that the applicant requested enrollment in the SBP with spouse coverage within 1 year of his date of marriage. There is no evidence the applicant submitted an application to enroll in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001062405C070421

    Original file (2001062405C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time the applicant retired in 1975, he had dependent children but was not married. The Board notes that the applicant had been retired for 23 years at the time of his marriage in 1998 and may not have remembered the requirements for enrolling in the SBP. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the applicant requested, in writing, that he be enrolled in the SBP for spouse coverage on 12 March 1999, within one year of the date...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01924

    Original file (BC 2014 01924.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: At the time of his retirement, he elected spouse and child coverage; however, due to his divorce the, SBP coverage was changed to former spouse and child. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DFAS-JFBE/CL recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05091

    Original file (BC 2012 05091.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the deceased service member be corrected to show that on 31 Dec 02, he elected spouse only Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage based on full retired pay. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-05091 in Executive Session on...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02386

    Original file (BC 2014 02386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of the former member’s death certificate, divorce decree, Separation and Property Settlement Agreement, marital status affidavit and various other documents associated with her request. None of the documents the applicant provided (Separation and Property Agreement or QDRO) had language that would entitle her to deem former spouse SBP coverage. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Her attorney submitted...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00415

    Original file (BC-2005-00415.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Even though the law in effect at the time of the applicant’s divorce did not allow retired members to provide former spouse SBP coverage, the member could have voluntarily elected former spouse SBP coverage on the applicant’s behalf when he applied for commencement of his retired pay, but he did not. A member, who has an eligible former spouse at the time of retirement, and does not elect SBP former spouse coverage, may not later elect that option unless Congress authorizes an open...